ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Leaf gas exchange measurement for steady-state stomatal conductance model calibration.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leaf gas exchange measurement for steady-state stomatal conductance model calibration.The New phytologist · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stomatal conductance models are essential components of crop and land surface models, but collecting data to calibrate them remains challenging due to large leaf-to-leaf variability, slow stomatal kinetics, and a lack of consistent measurement protocols, leading to unknown reliability and representativeness of calibrated model parameter estimates. We combined field measurements, 3D biophysical simulations, and statistical power analyses to quantify parameter calibration discrepancies with different instruments under different conditions to provide recommendations for protocol development. Leaf-to-leaf physiological variability in measured steady-state stomatal conductance exceeded threefold under identical conditions, calling into question the use of few steady-state response curves to represent a canopy. Stomatal kinetics introduce systematic error in parameter calibration, and slower stomatal response times necessitated larger survey sample sizes to recover known stomatal model parameters of simulated data. Primary recommendations are as follows: survey measurements (c. 100 samples) are needed to sample leaf-to-leaf variability and can be supplemented by steady-state measurements to better represent environmental responses, survey measurements should maximize the range of leaf-level environmental conditions while minimizing transient effects, and steady-state measurements with controlled environmental conditions should maintain constant conditions for 15-45 min before measurement to allow for true stomatal steady state and not just instrument equilibrium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.