Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684132›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

Leaf gas exchange measurement for steady-state stomatal conductance model calibration.

Kyle T Rizzo, Tong Lei, Thomas N Buckley, Brian N Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle T RizzoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-3864-4106
Tong LeiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Thomas N BuckleyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7610-7136
Brian N BaileyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1919-2324

Funding

Division of Integrative Organismal Systems 2047628Division of Integrative Organismal Systems 2307341National Institute of Food and Agriculture 7003146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomatal conductance models are essential components of crop and land surface models, but collecting data to calibrate them remains challenging due to large leaf-to-leaf variability, slow stomatal kinetics, and a lack of consistent measurement protocols, leading to unknown reliability and representativeness of calibrated model parameter estimates. We combined field measurements, 3D biophysical simulations, and statistical power analyses to quantify parameter calibration discrepancies with different instruments under different conditions to provide recommendations for protocol development. Leaf-to-leaf physiological variability in measured steady-state stomatal conductance exceeded threefold under identical conditions, calling into question the use of few steady-state response curves to represent a canopy. Stomatal kinetics introduce systematic error in parameter calibration, and slower stomatal response times necessitated larger survey sample sizes to recover known stomatal model parameters of simulated data. Primary recommendations are as follows: survey measurements (c. 100 samples) are needed to sample leaf-to-leaf variability and can be supplemented by steady-state measurements to better represent environmental responses, survey measurements should maximize the range of leaf-level environmental conditions while minimizing transient effects, and steady-state measurements with controlled environmental conditions should maintain constant conditions for 15-45 min before measurement to allow for true stomatal steady state and not just instrument equilibrium.

Indexed as

GasesModels, BiologicalPlant LeavesPlant StomataCalibrationKineticsPlant TranspirationGasesgas exchangemodel calibrationporometerprotocolstomatal conductance

Identifiers

PMID41684132
PMCPMC12961262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.