Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684078›Full record

ArticleActa neuropsychiatrica2026

The use of neuropsychological tasks to evaluate self-regulation in depression and anxiety during adolescence: a scoping review.

Georgia Eleftheriou, Mohammadamin Sinichi, Martin Gevonden, Lydia Krabbendam, Crick Lund, Mark J D Jordans, Brandon A Kohrt

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropsychiatrica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Georgia EleftheriouCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Scienceshttps://ror.org/00y4zzh67, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8713-0582
Mohammadamin SinichiVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martin GevondenVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lydia KrabbendamVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Crick LundKing's College London, UK.
Mark J D JordansKing's College London, UK.
Brandon A KohrtCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Scienceshttps://ror.org/00y4zzh67, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-regulation is central to adolescent emotional and cognitive development, and deficits in self-regulation may associate with depression and anxiety. This scoping review maps the use of the Emotional Go/No-Go (EGNG), Delay Discounting Task (DDT), and Balloon Analogue Risk Task and Youth version (BART) in studies of adolescent depression and anxiety, examines consistency of task implementation, and identifies methodological and geographic gaps.

methodsA PRISMA-ScR–compliant search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and PsycINFO from database inception to 15 December 2025 (initial search: 1 December 2023; updated: 15 December 2025). Data were charted using a standardised form. Eligible studies included adolescents, employed EGNG, DDT, or BART, and assessed depressive or anxiety symptoms.

resultsThirty reports were included (EGNG

conclusionThe current literature is concentrated in English-speaking higher-income contexts and has yielded few and inconsistent associations with adolescent depression and anxiety. Future research should harmonise protocols, expand evidence from low- and middle-income settings, and increase longitudinal and intervention-based studies to assess sensitivity to change and clinical utility.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionNeuropsychological TestsSelf-ControlAdolescentHumansAdolescentanxietydepressionexecutive functionneuropsychological tasks

Identifiers

PMID41684078
PMCPMC13130333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.