Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684052›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

Endangered species laws and the inclusion of Indigenous knowledges and sciences in risk assessments.

Jaime Grimm, Bruno E Soares, Leila Vaziri Zanjani, Myrle Ballard, Susan Chiblow, Renon S Andrade, Alexander T Duncan, Dylan J Fraser, Nicholas E Mandrak, Thaïs A Bernos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Endangered species laws and the inclusion of Indigenous knowledges and sciences in risk assessments.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jaime GrimmDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bruno E SoaresInstitute of Environmental Change & Society, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Leila Vaziri ZanjaniDepartment of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Myrle BallardDepartment of Earth, Energy and Environment, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Susan ChiblowSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Renon S AndradeRio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alexander T DuncanCentre for Indigenous Fisheries, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Dylan J FraserDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nicholas E MandrakDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Thaïs A BernosRubenstein Ecosystem Science Laboratory, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4884-4275

Funding

Canadian Institute of Ecology and EvolutionGenome Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous Peoples actively manage or have tenure rights over lands where many rare and valued species occur. To meet national and global conservation targets, it is important to meaningfully consider Indigenous knowledges and rights in endangered species laws. We examined whether the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA) has upheld its commitment to consider Indigenous knowledges in decisions pertaining to endangered species assessment. Using data from 823 species status assessments published from 1998 to 2023, we constructed indicators and derived a composite score for 5 tenets of Indigenized models of conservation: those that center Indigenous sovereignty, incorporate place-based knowledges, emphasize interconnectedness, draw from Indigenous knowledge sources, and recognize the cultural importance of species. Over the last quarter century, we found no evidence of improved consideration or inclusion of Indigenous knowledges and science in species status assessments. Although status assessments in northern jurisdictions tended to be better aligned with Indigenized frameworks of conservation, mean composite scores remained low across status assessments (mean = 0.9/5 in 2023). To advance the meaningful consideration of Indigenous Peoples and their knowledges in conservation practices and policies, we recommend honoring endangered species laws' specifications to consider Indigenous knowledges at every step of the process, from species assessment, to increasing capacity, to meaningfully engaging Indigenous Peoples.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesIndigenous PeoplesCanadaHumansRisk AssessmentAboriginal traditional knowledgesATKciencia indígenaconocimiento indígenaconocimiento tradicional aborigenconsultaconsultationCTAendangered species lawsIndigenous knowledgesIndigenous scienceLey de Especies en Riesgoleyes para especies en peligroSARASpecies at Risk Act加拿大《濒危物种法》原住民传统知识商讨土著人民知识土著人民科学濒危物种法律

Identifiers

PMID41684052
PMCPMC13392785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.