ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Endangered species laws and the inclusion of Indigenous knowledges and sciences in risk assessments.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endangered species laws and the inclusion of Indigenous knowledges and sciences in risk assessments.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Indigenous Peoples actively manage or have tenure rights over lands where many rare and valued species occur. To meet national and global conservation targets, it is important to meaningfully consider Indigenous knowledges and rights in endangered species laws. We examined whether the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA) has upheld its commitment to consider Indigenous knowledges in decisions pertaining to endangered species assessment. Using data from 823 species status assessments published from 1998 to 2023, we constructed indicators and derived a composite score for 5 tenets of Indigenized models of conservation: those that center Indigenous sovereignty, incorporate place-based knowledges, emphasize interconnectedness, draw from Indigenous knowledge sources, and recognize the cultural importance of species. Over the last quarter century, we found no evidence of improved consideration or inclusion of Indigenous knowledges and science in species status assessments. Although status assessments in northern jurisdictions tended to be better aligned with Indigenized frameworks of conservation, mean composite scores remained low across status assessments (mean = 0.9/5 in 2023). To advance the meaningful consideration of Indigenous Peoples and their knowledges in conservation practices and policies, we recommend honoring endangered species laws' specifications to consider Indigenous knowledges at every step of the process, from species assessment, to increasing capacity, to meaningfully engaging Indigenous Peoples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.