ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
ACMG-Recommended Actionable Secondary Findings from 1600 Clinical Exomes in the South Marmara Region in Turkiye.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In genetic disease assessment centers, DNA sequencing can produce results irrelevant to the genetic examination's purpose. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends evaluating and reporting 81 genes discovered using clinical genomic sequencing. While population studies on large cohorts can provide statistics on the prevalence of secondary findings (SFs), no studies have been published yet on large cohorts in Turkiye. We investigated ACMG SF by evaluating clinical exome sequencing data in 1600 individuals from different regions in Turkiye. We detected SF variants reported in ClinVar in 86 individuals (5.375%). Of the SFs, 30% were cardiovascular, 26% were cancer, 16% were neonatal metabolic disorders, and 28% were variants associated with various genetic diseases. In addition, we identified 212 different variants in 226 individuals and 45 different genes, which were not reported in ClinVar. When our results are compared with the Turkish National Genome and Bioinformatics Project database and studies in the literature, the studies vary in terms of participant characteristics, sequencing techniques, and versions of the ACMG SF list. Our findings highlight the importance of expanding and tailoring SF reporting guidelines in populations with high consanguinity and limited cohort-based data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.