Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41683850›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

In Silico Prediction and Validation of the Permeability of Small Molecules Across the Blood-Brain Barrier.

Favour Ajao, Dominique de Jong-Hoogland, Jakob P Ulmschneider, Martin B Ulmschneider, Edward Lambden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Favour AjaoDepartment of Chemistry, King's College London, London SE1 1DB, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-2552-2334
Dominique de Jong-HooglandDepartment of Chemistry, King's College London, London SE1 1DB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1655-2833
Jakob P UlmschneiderInstitute of Theoretical and Interdisciplinary Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0937-6963
Martin B UlmschneiderDepartment of Chemistry, King's College London, London SE1 1DB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8103-0516
Edward LambdenDepartment of Chemistry, King's College London, London SE1 1DB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9170-1077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding and predicting the ability of small-molecule drugs to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is essential for developing treatments for neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease. In this study, we aim to computationally estimate BBB permeability for pharmacologically relevant molecules using an all-atom, unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) framework accelerated by elevated-temperature simulations. Our approach infers physiological permeabilities via elevated temperature passive diffusion trajectories, enabling quantitative ranking across a chemically diverse compound set. The computed permeabilities are compared with available in vitro and in silico data for control molecules. We further explore the molecular mechanisms underlying permeability differences through their free energy profiles and lipid contact analyses, revealing molecule-specific interactions with individual lipid species in the BBB membrane. This work introduces a novel combination of elevated-temperature MD and mechanistic decomposition to assess BBB permeability and applies it to candidate molecules with therapeutic potential in neurodegeneration.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierSmall Molecule LibrariesComputer SimulationHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationPermeabilitySmall Molecule LibrariesAlzheimer’s diseaseblood–brain barrierdrug discoverymembrane permeabilitymolecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41683850
PMCPMC12898448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.