Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41683791›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Evaluation of AI-Predicted GH11 Xylanase Models Against a Previously Unreported Experimental Structure: Implications for Conformational Accuracy and Ligand Binding.

Ki Hyun Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ki Hyun NamCollege of General Education, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3268-354X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1I1A1A01050838PAL-XFEL XFEL2025-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based structure prediction tools have emerged as powerful methods for understanding previously unsolved structures. AI-predicted models are widely used for protein function identification, drug development, and protein engineering. Although AI-predicted structures offer significant opportunities to advance research, their inaccuracies can lead to misinterpretations of molecular mechanisms. Thus, evaluating the structural differences between AI-predicted and experimental structures is crucial for accurately understanding molecular mechanisms and guiding the design of subsequent experiments. In this study, the previously unreported crystal structure of xylanase from

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEndo-1,4-beta XylanasesHypocreaBinding SitesCrystallography, X-RayLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationEndo-1,4-beta XylanasesLigandsAlphaFoldartificial intelligenceESMFoldGH11protein structureRoseTTAFoldxylanase

Identifiers

PMID41683791
PMCPMC12897616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.