Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41683778›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Effectiveness and Safety of Mechanical Debridement for Treating Experimental Peri-Implantitis in Elderly Rats Receiving Oncological Dosages of Zoledronate.

Luan Felipe Toro, Eduardo Quintão Manhanini Souza, Vinícius Franzão Ganzaroli, Jéssica de Oliveira Alvarenga Freire, Leandro Lemes da Costa, Estevão Lopes Pereira, Beatriz Alexandrelli Machado, João Martins de Mello-Neto, Mariza Akemi Matsumoto, Cláudio Aparecido Casatti and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Luan Felipe ToroDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo Quintão Manhanini SouzaDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
Vinícius Franzão GanzaroliDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
Jéssica de Oliveira Alvarenga FreireDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
Leandro Lemes da CostaDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
Estevão Lopes PereiraDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9766-7519
Beatriz Alexandrelli MachadoDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
João Martins de Mello-NetoCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1780-7623
Mariza Akemi MatsumotoDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5389-0105
Cláudio Aparecido CasattiDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
Luciano Tavares Ângelo CintraDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2348-7846
Letícia Helena TheodoroDepartment of Diagnostic and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3026-8369
Valdir Gouveia GarciaLatin American Institute of Dental Research and Education (ILAPEO), Curitiba 80810-030, PR, Brazil.
Edilson ErvolinoDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant #2019/17769-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of mechanical debridement (MD) in treating experimental peri-implantitis (EPI) in rats with osseointegrated implants, specifically those treated with high-dose zoledronate. Senescent Wistar rats underwent the extraction of their upper incisor, followed by immediate implant placement. After 8 weeks, the implants were exposed, and a transmucosal component was placed. The animals were divided into four groups: Control (C), ZOL, ZOL-EPI, and ZOL-EPI-MD. In the 9th week, drug treatment commenced, consisting of the administration of 0.45 mL of a vehicle (for group C) or zoledronate (for groups ZOL, ZOL-EPI, and ZOL-EPI-MD) every 4 days over 10 weeks. After 5 weeks of drug treatment, a cotton bandage was placed around the implants to induce EPI in the ZOL-EPI and ZOL-EPI-MD groups. In the ZOL-EPI-MD group, the ligature was removed at week 16, and local treatment was performed using MD. Euthanasia was conducted at week 19. Histological sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin-eosin for histopathological and histometric analyses, such as the percentage of total bone tissue (B.Ar/T.Ar) and the percentage of non-vital bone tissue (NVB.Ar/B.Ar). Immunohistochemical reactions were performed to detect TNFα, IL-1β, VEGF, OCN, and TRAP. In the peri-implant connective tissue, mild, intense, and moderate inflammatory infiltrates were observed in the ZOL, ZOL-EPI, and ZOL-EPI-MD groups, respectively. Immunolabeling for TNFα and IL-1β correlated with these histopathological findings. The ZOL and ZOL-EPI-MD groups showed lower immunolabeling for VEGF compared to the control group. There was a reduction in TRAP-positive cells and lower immunolabeling for OCN in the groups treated with zoledronate, with the ZOL-EPI-MD group displaying even lower levels of OCN compared to the ZOL group. While there was no significant difference in B.Ar/T.Ar across the groups, both the ZOL, ZOL-EPI, and ZOL-EPI-MD groups exhibited higher levels of NVB.Ar/B.Ar, with the ZOL-EPI-MD group showing the highest NVB.Ar/B.Ar compared to ZOL and the other groups. In conclusion, MD, as a standalone treatment, showed neither effectiveness nor safety in the management of EPI in rats that received high doses of zoledronate.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDebridementPeri-ImplantitisZoledronic AcidAnimalsDiphosphonatesDisease Models, AnimalImidazolesMaleRatsRats, WistarVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesImidazolesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AZoledronic Aciddebridementdental implantosteonecrosisperi-implantitiszoledronate

Identifiers

PMID41683778
PMCPMC12898286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.