Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41683651›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Combined Therapy Versus Fortified Anti-VEGF Monotherapy in Type C Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Long-Term Outcomes and Exploratory Biomarker Insights.

Windsor Wen-Jin Chao, Howard Wen-Haur Chao, Hsiao-Ming Chao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Windsor Wen-Jin ChaoDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Howard Wen-Haur ChaoDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Hsiao-Ming ChaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei 111, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While standard anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, with or without photodynamic therapy (PDT), is effective for patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), not all achieve optimal visual outcomes. This study aimed to compare fortified (double the dose and the volume of the standard one) anti-VEGF combined with PDT versus fortified anti-VEGF monotherapy and to investigate biomolecular profiles and disease relationships among PCV, neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD), and central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). The goal was to identify novel pathways to inform future therapeutic strategies, including hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF)-1α inhibitors. This retrospective cohort study included 23 eyes with indocyanine green-confirmed type C PCV. One eye treated with transpupillary thermotherapy was not included in the following two groups. Patients received either combined therapy (PDT + fortified-dose anti-VEGF;

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsPolypoidal Choroidal VasculopathyVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAgedBiomarkersCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitMaleMiddle AgedPhotochemotherapyRanibizumabRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkersHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aanti-VEGFcombined therapyCSCRmonotherapynvAMDPCVPDT

Identifiers

PMID41683651
PMCPMC12897784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.