ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Therapeutic Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Agents Versus Corticosteroids in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Comparative Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This structured narrative review compared the efficacy, durability, and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and intravitreal corticosteroids for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), with the aim of identifying patient- and disease-specific factors to guide individualize therapy. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for studies published between January 2009 and November 2025, including randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and large observational cohorts with at least six months of follow-up. Visual acuity, anatomical outcomes, treatment burden, durability, and safety were extracted, and evidence quality was assessed using the GRADE framework. Eleven studies encompassing 1341 eyes were included. Anti-VEGF therapy consistently produced greater improvements in best-corrected visual acuity, particularly in treatment-naïve eyes and in patients with worse baseline vision, whereas corticosteroids achieved larger reductions in central macular thickness and significantly reduced injection burden because of longer durability. However, corticosteroid therapy was associated with higher rates of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract progression. In pseudophakic patients and in chronic or refractory DME, functional and anatomical outcomes were generally comparable between the two therapeutic classes. Combination therapy resulted in the greatest anatomical improvement but at the cost of increased ocular adverse events. Overall, anti-VEGF agents remain the preferred first-line treatment for most patients with DME owing to superior visual outcomes and a more favorable safety profile, while corticosteroids represent valuable alternatives in pseudophakic eyes, chronic or anti-VEGF-refractory DME, and cases with prominent inflammatory features, provided that careful monitoring for ocular adverse events is maintained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.