Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41683417›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence for Perovskite Additive Engineering: From Molecular Screening to Autonomous Discovery.

Xin-De Wang, Zhi-Rui Chen, Wen-Kao Li, Peng-Jie Guo, Cheng Mu, Ze-Feng Gao, Zhong-Yi Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xin-De WangSchool of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Zhi-Rui ChenSchool of Chemistry and Life Resource, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Wen-Kao LiSchool of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Peng-Jie GuoSchool of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Cheng MuSchool of Chemistry and Life Resource, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Ze-Feng GaoSchool of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6695-8209
Zhong-Yi LuSchool of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8866-3180

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation Z250005National Key R\&D Program of China 2024YFA1408601National Natural Science Foundation of China 11934020National Natural Science Foundation of China 62476278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive engineering plays a crucial role in enhancing the performance of perovskite solar cells (PSCs), yet identifying suitable additives within the vast chemical space remains a significant challenge. This paper describes a paradigm shift in additive discovery from trial-and-error methods to AI-driven approaches. We first establish the physicochemical foundations of additive engineering and the descriptors commonly employed in machine learning algorithms. Next, we discuss intelligent process optimization, highlighting how active learning algorithms effectively tune complex precursor formulations with minimal experimental iterations. Additionally, we explore the role of AI in mechanism elucidation and the potential prospects of generative models in the field of additives. Finally, we emphasize the emerging trend of integrating large language models with autonomous laboratories for closed-loop autonomous discovery, offering a promising pathway to accelerate the commercialization of PSCs.

Indexed as

additive engineeringautonomous discoveryhigh-throughput screeningmachine learningperovskite solar cells

Identifiers

PMID41683417
PMCPMC12899829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.