ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Analytical Methodologies for Benzo[a]pyrene in Foods: A Review of Advances in Sample Preparation and Detection Techniques.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), a potent carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, is a critical food contaminant originating from environmental deposition and thermal processing, posing a significant threat to public health and driving stringent global regulations. This review critically examines recent advancements in analytical methodologies for BaP determination, giving particular emphasis to sample preparation and detection techniques. The discussion covers the evolution from conventional methods, such as solid-phase extraction, towards more efficient and sustainable approaches, including magnetic, dispersive, and molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction, as well as microextraction techniques and gel permeation chromatography. For detection, the performance of established chromatographic methods, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD), is evaluated against emerging rapid techniques such as sensors, immunoassays, and spectroscopic methods. The analysis reveals that while significant progress has been made in improving sensitivity, selectivity, and throughput, challenges remain in balancing speed with accuracy, managing matrix effects, and translating novel materials from research to routine application. The review concludes by underscoring the necessity for future development to focus on the integration of smart materials, automation, and advanced data science to achieve robust, on-site, and holistic monitoring solutions for ensuring food safety against BaP contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.