Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41683018›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Recent Progress in Probiotic Encapsulation: Techniques, Characterization and Food Industry Prospects.

Zixin Jin, Yi Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Alginate-Based Encapsulation ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A Rushan Acid Whey-DerivedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zixin JinCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yi WangCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although probiotics are widely used in the food industry due to their health-promoting effects, their application is often limited by low stability and poor viability under processing, storage, and gastrointestinal conditions. Encapsulation has emerged as a promising strategy to address these issues, offering enhanced protection and controlled release of probiotic strains. This review summarizes recent advances in encapsulation techniques relevant to food applications, including spray drying, freeze drying, coacervation, and liposome formation, as well as novel approaches such as multilayer nanocoatings and dual-core systems. The use of natural biopolymers such as alginate, chitosan, and pectin, along with food-grade synthetic materials, has greatly improved the stability of probiotics in complex food matrices. Furthermore, emerging technologies such as cell-mediated coatings offer improved resistance to gastric acid and oxygen, enhancing probiotic survival through the gastrointestinal tract. These advances contribute to the development of functional foods with better health benefits. However, challenges remain regarding scalability, strain-specific encapsulation efficiency, and regulatory approval. Future research should focus on optimizing food-grade materials, exploring synergistic effects with bioactive compounds, and ensuring consistent performance across food systems.

Indexed as

encapsulationintestinal healthprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID41683018
PMCPMC12897067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.