ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Recent Applications of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pesticide Analysis in Food Samples.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- SERS-Based Detection of Food Contaminants: From Laboratory Sensitivity to Practical Implementation-Bottlenecks and Pathways to Standardization.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From laboratory to field: a critical review of multi-modal sensing frameworks for emerging contaminant monitoring.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Food characterization in the omics era: current advances, analytical approaches, and future perspectives.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Thermosonication of traditional poppy vinegar: modulation of biomolecules, phenolic profile, and antidiabetic potential in a functional fermented food.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable monitoring of pesticide residues is essential for ensuring food safety. Conventional chromatographic and spectrometric techniques remain labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly. Recent progress in Machine Learning (ML) provides computational tools that improve the precision and efficiency of pesticide residue detection in diverse food matrices. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of current ML-based approaches for pesticide analysis, with particular attention to supervised learning algorithms such as support vector machines, random forests, boosting methods, and deep neural networks. These models have been integrated with chromatographic, spectroscopic, and electrochemical platforms to achieve enhanced signal interpretation and more reliable prediction from existing analytical data, and more robust data processing in complex food systems. The review also discusses methodologies for feature extraction, model validation, and the management of heterogeneous datasets, while examining ongoing challenges that include limited training data, matrix variability, and regulatory constraints. Emerging advances in deep learning architectures, transfer learning strategies, and portable sensing technologies are expected to support the development of real-time, field-ready monitoring systems. The findings highlight the potential of ML to advance food quality assurance and strengthen public health protection through more efficient and accurate pesticide residue detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.