ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
The Two-Device Problem: A Comprehensive Framework for Managing Transvalvular CIED Leads in the Era of Transcatheter Tricuspid Intervention.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with transvalvular cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads is increasingly encountered as transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) expand, yet integrated guidance for managing this "two-device problem" remains limited. We performed a focused synthesis of contemporary evidence, organizing findings around mechanisms and diagnosis of TR in the setting of CIED leads, lead-device interactions across TTVI platforms, and clinical trade-offs of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) versus lead preservation or jailing. CIED-associated TR can arise from lead-leaflet impingement, leaflet injury, fibrotic adhesion, pacing-induced remodeling, or infection; true CIED-induced TR accounts for a minority of clinically significant TR, yet progression of TR after lead implantation occurs in 7-45% of patients, and moderate-to-severe TR in CIED populations is associated with 1.6- to 2.5-fold increased mortality risk. Lead conflict and lifetime consequences differ by TTVI modality: repair approaches are generally more lead-tolerant, whereas valve replacement creates obligate lead jailing with implications for lead performance, future extraction feasibility, and infection management. Management of TR with transvalvular CIED leads requires integrated Heart Team planning that anticipates downstream device needs. Standardized TR phenotyping, lead-aware TTVI selection, valve-sparing rhythm-device strategies, and structured post-procedural surveillance may improve outcomes; prospective studies are needed to define optimal extract-versus-jail pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.