ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026
Optimizing Autologous Serum Tear Therapy for Dry Eye Disease: Strategies and Innovations.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autologous serum (AS) tears are an effective therapeutic option for advanced DED, mimicking the biochemical composition of natural tears. However, the absence of universally accepted guidelines has resulted in variability in AS tear concentration, diluents, processing of collected blood, and storage conditions, raising questions regarding the optimal parameters for AS tear use. This perspective provides a framework to inform clinical implementation and to guide future research on AS tear therapy optimization. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English-language articles from January 2022 through September 2025 using the terms "autologous serum," "dry eye disease," "dry eye syndrome," "dry eye," and "DED." Evidence suggests that AS tears diluted to 20% are widely used for moderate DED, whereas higher concentrations may provide faster, more pronounced and more durable improvements, particularly in severe cases. Levofloxacin-containing eye drops, artificial tears without emphasis on a specific component, sodium hyaluronate (SH)-containing eye drops, cyclosporine A (CsA)-containing ultra-nano emulsions, and methylcellulose have been investigated as alternatives to conventional diluents. Standardization of clotting, centrifugation and storage parameters is expected to enhance efficacy of AS tears and ensure stability of growth factors. Combination with estrogen replacement therapy in perimenopausal women or with topical insulin eye drops, as well as perioperative prophylactic use in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-associated dry eye undergoing cataract surgery, represent emerging applications of AS tears that demonstrate potential to improve therapeutic outcomes. Overall, this perspective highlights the need for consensus protocols, supports severity-based concentration tailoring, and notes that diluents and processing methods require further refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.