ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Rationale, Evidence, and Contemporary Strategies Beyond Pulmonary Veins.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating preoperative multiregion radiomic features with clinical data to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality due to increased risks of stroke, heart failure, and death. Catheter ablation is now firmly established as a first-line or early rhythm control strategy in selected patients with paroxysmal AF and as a Class I indication in symptomatic patients with persistent AF refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy. However, outcomes remain more variable in persistent and long-standing persistent AF, reflecting greater atrial substrate complexity, procedural challenges, and ongoing uncertainty regarding optimal ablation strategies. This review provides a structured, evidence-based overview of contemporary catheter ablation approaches for AF, with particular emphasis on persistent disease. We discuss the anatomical and mechanistic rationale underlying pulmonary vein isolation and adjunctive lesion sets, summarize current clinical evidence supporting various strategies, and highlight differences in efficacy, safety, and reproducibility. In addition, we address the importance of patient selection, shared decision making, procedural expertise, and comprehensive risk factor modification as integral components of successful long-term rhythm control. By integrating guideline recommendations with mechanistic insights and clinical trial data, this review aims to clarify the current best practices and identify remaining knowledge gaps in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.