ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Cardiac Rehabilitation After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiac Rehabilitation-Current Paradigms and Challenges Across the Cardiovascular Continuum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, given safety, reduced heart failure-related hospitalizations, and, above all, 5-year mortality rates nearly identical to those of heart transplants, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have increasingly become a treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure. However, improvements in functional capacity after LVAD implantation are minimal or modest, depending on pre-implantation right ventricular function, the patient's hemodynamic status, the optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy, and noncardiac factors (physical deconditioning, skeletal muscle alterations, anemia, and alterations in alveolar gas exchange). Therefore, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a fundamental element from the early stages after LVAD implantation, as it is not only safe but also highly effective, leading to improved functional capacity and fewer episodes of worsening heart failure, and may be associated with reduced mortality. To perform safe and effective CR in patients with LVADs, it is crucial to account for the unique issues in this group. This includes the difficulty of detecting an arterial pulse with standard tools during CPR and the importance of closely monitoring the transmission line and LVAD controller to prevent unintended damage. Overall, the clinical trial indicates that exercise-based CR has the potential to improve functional capacity. Furthermore, some data suggest that CR is associated with fewer HF-related hospitalizations and may be linked to lower mortality; however, there is no consensus on this matter, partly because most studies supporting this assertion are observational.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.