ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Strategies for a Rational Use of Opioids in Critical Care Settings.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy under awake regional anaesthesia with immediate prepectoral reconstruction using lightweight implants in a patient with severe cardiomyopathy: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Analgosedation During the Use of Non-Invasive Respiratory Supports: A Synthesis of Clinical Evidence and Best Practices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Oxycodone vs Remifentanil for Analgesia in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients: Retrospective Review of Medical Records for Delirium Incidence and Duration.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Magnesium Sulfate as an Analgesic and Sedative-sparing Agent in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial.Journal of research in pharmacy practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opioids play a central role in pain management and sedation in Intensive Care Units (ICUs), where critically ill patients frequently experience moderate-to-severe pain due to illness and invasive procedures or devices. Uncontrolled pain exacerbates stress responses, contributing to clinical deterioration and adverse outcomes. Although analgesics and sedatives can mitigate these effects, their use must be carefully individualized to avoid complications such as delirium, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and increased mortality. Evidence now shows that excessive or poorly controlled analgosedation can prolong ICU length of stay and delay recovery. Current guidelines recommend opioids as first-line agents for severe acute pain in the ICU, preferably within a multimodal analgesia framework to optimize pain control while minimizing adverse effects. Opioids are also essential for improving tolerance to invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Modern ICU practice emphasizes an analgesia-first or "analgosedation" strategy, prioritizing pain control with intravenous opioids before adding sedatives. This approach aims to achieve light sedation, reduce ventilator days, and improve overall outcomes. Commonly used opioids include fentanyl, morphine, hydromorphone, sufentanil, and remifentanil, with short-acting agents favored when rapid titration is required. Our narrative review aims to evaluate the clinical impact of opioid use in critically ill patients, including post-ICU outcomes, and to explore the role of opioid stewardship in optimizing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.