ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Predictors of Rehabilitation Outcomes Following Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends in neuroprosthetic technologies to restore sensations.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cochlear implantation (CI) is a well-established intervention for improving auditory and speech development in children with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Nonetheless, postoperative rehabilitation outcomes exhibit substantial individual variability. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence on predictors of rehabilitation success following pediatric CI. A robust set of general factors is consistently linked to more favorable outcomes, including earlier age at implantation (with particular benefit within the first year of life), stronger preoperative receptive language skills and speech recognition, higher developmental quotient and nonverbal intelligence, and higher parental educational level. Regarding hearing-specific variables, later-onset deafness, a shorter duration of deafness, and identifiable etiologies (notably specific genetic mutations such as GJB2 and OTOF) exert significant influence. Furthermore, bilateral CI demonstrates superior outcomes compared to unilateral CI, with the surgical timing (simultaneous versus sequential) and factors such as electrode array selection and placement being critical determinants. Overall, postoperative outcomes arise from a complex interplay of biological, developmental, and environmental factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.