ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Multimodality Imaging Approach in Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Aortic Coarctation in Adulthood.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic coarctation (CoA) comprises local narrowing of the aortic lumen, which is located at the level of the isthmus in 95% of patients and accounts for 5 to 8% of live births with congenital heart disease. It can be associated with other congenital defects, such as a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and in adulthood should be considered a secondary cause of hypertension in patients younger than 40 years, particularly in the presence of severe or resistant hypertension, in accordance with current hypertension guidelines. A correct diagnosis is necessary for the proper assessment and management of these patients. A multimodality imaging approach using ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and MRI allows for accurate and effective diagnosis. The purpose of this review is to describe different non-invasive imaging techniques and highlight their advantages and disadvantages, aiming to provide a guide to clinicians and cardiovascular imaging specialists in choosing the best imaging tools to use in adults with native CoA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.