ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
ACL-ECG: Anatomy-Aware Contrastive Learning for Multi-Lead Electrocardiograms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning has achieved impressive progress in automated electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, yet its performance still relies heavily on large-scale labeled datasets. As ECG annotation requires cardiologists, this process is costly and time-consuming, limiting its scalability in clinical practice. Contrastive learning offers a promising alternative by enabling the extraction of generalizable representations from unlabeled ECG data. In this study, we propose Anatomy-Aware Contrastive Learning for ECG (ACL-ECG), a self-supervised method that incorporates cardiac anatomical relationships into contrastive learning. ACL-ECG employs a physiology-aware augmentation strategy to generate rhythm-preserving augmented views, including random scale cropping, cardiac-cycle masking, and temporal shifting. Furthermore, ECG leads are grouped into four anatomically meaningful regions-anterior, inferior, septal, and lateral-and region-level contrastive objectives are introduced to promote intra-region consistency while enhancing inter-region discriminability. Extensive evaluations of downstream tasks demonstrate that ACL-ECG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art contrastive baselines under linear probing, achieving improvements of up to 1.29% in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and 3.57% in the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Moreover, when fine-tuned using only 10% of labeled data, ACL-ECG attains a performance comparable to fully supervised training, effectively reducing annotation requirements by approximately 5∼8×. Ablation studies further confirm the contributions of both the physiology-aware augmentation strategy and the anatomy-aware contrastive objective. Overall, ACL-ECG enhances representation quality without increasing annotation burden, and provides a promising and anatomy-informed foundation for self-supervised ECG analysis in label-scarce settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.