ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Scanning Magnetic Microscopy Using a High-Sensitivity Room-Temperature Tunnel Magnetoresistance Sensor for Geological Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper reports magnetic microscopy using high-sensitivity room-temperature tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) devices for thin geological sections. The sensitivity region of the TMR sensor has dimensions of 178 µm (L) × 0.1 µm (W) × 100 µm (H), consisting of two TMR devices. Magnetic images were obtained for a vertically magnetized Hawaii basalt thin section in two sensor configurations, with the sensor length aligned parallel to the X- (lift-off = 174 μm) and Y-axes (lift-off = 200 μm), without introducing anisotropic distortion in the magnetic images. Although the magnetic images obtained with a scanning SQUID microscope (SSM) were similar, slight discrepancies were observed in the high-spatial-resolution region. A magnetic point source (50 μm × 50 μm) with a perpendicular magnetization film was prepared for evaluation. The SSM measurements showed a clear magnetic dipole at an angle of approximately 1° from the vertical direction. The FWHMs for both the SSM and TMR sensors increased linearly with lift-off. However, the peak magnetic fields, magnetic moments, and dipole tilts of the TMR sensor were significantly larger than those of the SSM sensor. This discrepancy may be due to the vertical extent of the active region of the TMR sensor, as well as due to sensor noise and drift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.