ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation in a Controlled In Vitro Vascular Model: Benchmarking Machine Learning Approaches.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the feasibility of estimating stiffness-related parameters and pulse wave velocity (PWV) in a controlled in vitro circulatory setup using artificial silicone vessels with systematically varied Shore A hardness and wall thickness. From synchronized pressure and capacitive waveforms, fiducial points and engineered features are extracted, together with pump settings (stroke volume and heart rate). A Sugeno-type adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is used for hardness-level prediction and benchmarked against linear regression and contemporary machine-learning/deep-learning baselines using stratified cross-validation. PWV estimates derived via hardness-to-elasticity conversion models and the Moens-Korteweg formulation are evaluated against a reference PWV obtained within the same experimental configuration. Under these controlled conditions, the proposed pipeline shows strong agreement with reference labels and measurements. The results should be interpreted as an in vitro validation step; translation to biological tissues or in vivo data will require external validation, calibration of material-property mapping, and robustness testing under physiological variability and measurement noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.