ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Real-Time Emotion Recognition Performance of Mobile Devices: A Detailed Analysis of Camera and TrueDepth Sensors Using Apple's ARKit.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interaction- and asymmetry-aware facial blendshape analysis for objective quantification of Parkinsonian hypomimia.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Facial features hold information about a person's emotions, motor function, or genetic defects. Since most current mobile devices are capable of real-time face detection using cameras and depth sensors, real-time facial analysis can be utilized in several mobile use cases. Understanding the real-time emotion recognition capabilities of device sensors and frameworks is vital for developing new, valid applications. Therefore, we evaluated on-device emotion recognition using Apple's ARKit on an iPhone 14 Pro. A native app elicited 36 blend shape-specific movements and 7 discrete emotions from N=31 healthy adults. Per frame, standardized ARKit blend shapes were classified using a prototype-based cosine similarity metric; performance was summarized as accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Cosine similarity achieved an overall accuracy of 68.3%, exceeding the mean of three human raters (58.9%; +9.4 percentage points, ≈16% relative). Per-emotion accuracy was highest for joy, fear, sadness, and surprise, and competitive for anger, disgust, and contempt. AUCs were ≥0.84 for all classes. The method runs in real time on-device using only vector operations, preserving privacy and minimizing compute. These results indicate that a simple, interpretable cosine-similarity classifier over ARKit blend shapes delivers human-comparable, real-time facial emotion recognition on commodity hardware, supporting privacy-preserving mobile applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.