ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Application and Comparison of FPGA-Based Carry Chain TDC and DDMTD Schemes in High-Precision Time Synchronization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-precision phase difference measurement based on field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) has important application requirements in fields such as high-stability time-frequency transmission, signal synchronization, and precision testing. Addressing the limitations of traditional methods in terms of temperature stability and measurement accuracy, this paper proposes two high-precision phase difference measurement schemes based on the FPGA platform. An eight-parallel-multi-carry chain time-to-digital converter (TDC) and digital dual-mixer time difference (DDMTD) measurement modules are constructed to perform high-precision phase difference measurements on the phase-shifted output signal of the MMCM dynamic phase-shifted module. Results show that at room temperature (25 °C), the single-carry chain TDC exhibits better measurement accuracy than the DDMTD, and the single-carry chain TDC's measurement error range of 4.7-6.0 ps is superior to the DDMTD's 20-75 ps error range. Under different temperature conditions, the eight-parallel-multi-carry chain TDC consistently demonstrates superior measurement accuracy, resolution, and temperature stability compared to the single-carry chain TDC. In terms of measurement accuracy, under room temperature conditions, in three sets of phase difference tests (178.5714 ps, 357.1428 ps, and 535.7142 ps), the measurement error of the eight-parallel-multi-carry chain TDC was controlled within 4.6 ps, which is better than the 4.7-6.0 ps error range of the single-carry chain TDC. Average resolution: The average resolution of the single-carry chain TDC was 6.329 ps, while the average resolution of the eight-parallel-multi-carry chain TDC improved to 0.833 ps. Temperature stability: Within the temperature range of 10 °C to 100 °C, the temperature coefficient of the single-carry chain TDC was 0.002127 ps/°C, while the temperature coefficient of the eight-parallel-multi-carry chain TDC decreased to 0.000564 ps/°C. This paper also summarizes the advantages and limitations of the above methods in terms of implementation complexity and robustness, providing a reference for the optimized design of high-precision phase difference measurement technology for FPGA platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.