SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Image Quality Standardization in Radiomics: A Systematic Review of Artifacts, Variability, and Feature Stability.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Performance of Machine Learning Models Based on Medical Imaging in Predicting Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The translational chasm in machine learning for triple-negative breast cancer: a quantitative landscape assessment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing Respiratory Motion Stability of NovelDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Incremental diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography-derived pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Category-ComBat with distribution coefficient: a scale-adaptive harmonization algorithm for multicenter radiomic feature standardization.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper explores the role of metrology in the assessment of image quality in the field of radiomics. Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is central to ensuring the reliability and reproducibility of radiomic analyses, as it directly affects the accuracy of feature extraction and segmentation, ultimately impacting diagnostic outcomes. From the analysis of approximately 20,000 papers sourced from three databases (PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore), last searched in December 2025, the need for standardized imaging protocols and quality control measures emerges as a critical theme. Studies were included if they involved radiomic feature extraction and evaluated the impact of image quality variations on feature robustness and no formal risk-of-bias assessment was performed. A total of 105 studies were included, covering different medical imaging modalities. Across the included studies, noise, motion, acquisition and reconstruction parameters, and other artifacts consistently emerged as major sources of radiomic feature instability. Indeed, in most papers, IQA is neglected, while the effect of poor-quality images is reported. This research identifies and discusses the relevant issues reported in clinical practice, as well as the main metrics adopted for image quality evaluation. Through a comprehensive review of current literature and an analysis of emerging trends, this paper highlights the urgent need for innovative solutions in image quality metrics tailored to radiomics applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.