ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Hybrid Hash-Encryption Scheme for Secure Transmission and Verification of Marine Scientific Research Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine scientific observation missions operate over disrupted, high-loss links and must keep heterogeneous sensor, image, and log data confidential and verifiable under fragmented, out-of-order delivery. This paper proposes an end-to-end encryption-verification co-design that integrates HMR integrity structuring with EMR hybrid encapsulation. By externalizing block boundaries and maintaining a minimal receiver-side verification state, the framework supports block-level integrity/provenance verification and selective recovery without continuous sessions, enabling multi-hop and intermittent connectivity. Experiments on a synthetic multimodal ocean dataset show reduced storage/encapsulation overhead (10.4% vs. 12.8% for SHA-256 + RSA + AES), lower hashing latency (6.8 ms vs. 12.5 ms), and 80.1 ms end-to-end encryption-decryption latency (21.2% lower than RSA + AES). Under fragmentation, verification latency scales near-linearly with block count (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.