Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41682501›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Assessment of Biophilic Design in Educational Corridors and Stairwells Using fNIRS and GSR with Generative AI Stimuli.

Ji-Yeon Kim, Sung-Jun Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ji-Yeon KimDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-7798-0720
Sung-Jun ParkDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0002-7498-6602

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2C1012228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contemporary educational spaces, circulation spaces such as corridors and stairwells are central to students' daily experience, yet their capacity to serve as therapeutic environments remains underexplored. This study quantitatively evaluated the physiological and neurocognitive impacts of Biophilic Design (BD) in these circulation spaces. Thirty university students experienced immersive virtual scenarios of corridors and stairwells that integrated four BD elements-weather & view, plants & landscape, material & texture, and forms & shapes-while prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity and stress responses were simultaneously captured using functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and Galvanic Skin Response (GSR). Results showed that BD conditions produced significantly greater stress reduction, reflected in lower GSR, compared with non-BD conditions. fNIRS analyses further indicated enhanced PFC activation, with spatially differentiated patterns that varied by circulation space type and by specific BD elements. Collectively, these findings offer empirical neurophysiological evidence that applying BD to educational circulation spaces can mitigate stress and foster psychological stability, thereby providing a robust basis for evidence-based strategies to create healthier, cognitively supportive learning environments.

Indexed as

Galvanic Skin ResponseAdultFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMalePrefrontal CortexSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredStudentsYoung Adultbiophilic designcorridor and stairwelleducational spacefNIRSgenerative AIGSRneurophysiological assessment

Identifiers

PMID41682501
PMCPMC12900094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.