ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Multi-Modal Decision-Level Fusion Framework for Hypervelocity Impact Damage Classification in Spacecraft.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During on-orbit service, spacecraft are subjected to hypervelocity impacts (HVIs) from micrometeoroids and space debris, causing diverse damage types that challenge structural health assessment. Unimodal approaches often struggle with similar damage patterns due to mechanical noise and imaging distance variations. To overcome these physical limitations, this study proposes a physics-informed multimodal fusion framework. Innovatively, we integrate a distance-aware infrared enhancement strategy with vibration spectral subtraction to align heterogeneous data qualities while employing a dual-stream ResNet coupled with Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory to rigorously resolve inter-modal conflicts at the decision level. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed strategy achieves a mean accuracy of 99.01%, significantly outperforming unimodal baselines (92.96% and 97.11%). Notably, the fusion mechanism corrects specific misclassifications in micro-cracks and perforation, ensuring a precision exceeding 96.9% across all categories with high stability (standard deviation 0.74%). These findings validate the efficacy of multimodal fusion for precise on-orbit damage assessment, offering a robust solution for spacecraft structural health monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.