Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41682480›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Path Planning and Trajectory Tracking Research for Autonomous Vehicles from 2000 to 2025.

Bo Niu, Roman Y Dobretsov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bo NiuInstitute of Machinery, Materials, and Transport, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0009-0007-3602-1101
Roman Y DobretsovInstitute of Machinery, Materials, and Transport, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3827-0220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of the automotive industry, autonomous driving has attracted growing research interest, among which path planning and trajectory tracking play a central role. To better understand the evolution, current status, and future directions of this field, this study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis combined with latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling on publications related to autonomous vehicle path planning and trajectory tracking indexed in the Web of Science database. Multiple dimensions are examined, including publication trends, highly cited authors, leading institutions, research domains, and keyword co-occurrence patterns. The results reveal a sustained growth in research output, with trajectory planning, path optimization, trajectory tracking, and model predictive control (MPC) emerging as dominant topics, alongside a notable rise in learning-based approaches. In particular, reinforcement learning (RL) and deep reinforcement learning (DRL) have become increasingly prominent in complex decision-making and tracking control scenarios. The analysis further identifies core contributors and institutions, highlighting the leading roles of China and the United States in this research area. Overall, the findings provide a systematic overview of the knowledge structure and evolving research trends, offering valuable insights into key opportunities and challenges and supporting future research toward safer and more intelligent autonomous driving systems.

Indexed as

autonomous vehiclesbibliometric analysispath planningtrajectory trackingvisualization analysis

Identifiers

PMID41682480
PMCPMC12900099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.