ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Trajectory Optimization of Airport Surface Guidance Operations for Unmanned Guidance Vehicles.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electric-powered unmanned guidance vehicles provide surface taxiing guidance for arriving and departing aircraft within the airport movement area, enabling sustained safety under complex operational conditions and improving overall operational efficiency, particularly under low-visibility scenarios. In this context, how to design scientifically rigorous operational trajectories for the three phases of unmanned guidance vehicle operations-dispatch, guidance, and recovery-remains an open and important research problem. This study proposes a three-stage trajectory-planning method for unmanned guidance vehicles, including initial trajectory planning, conflict prediction, and conflict resolution. First, the Guidance Unit-composed of the unmanned guidance vehicle and the guided aircraft-is defined, and a standard speed-profile design model is established for this unit. Then, considering airport operational-safety constraints, a conflict prediction algorithm for the guidance process is developed, which identifies potential conflicts in guidance trajectory planning based on time-window overlap analysis. Subsequently, under operational safety constraints, an optimization model aiming to minimize the maximum guidance time is formulated, and a trajectory planning algorithm for unmanned guidance vehicles based on the improved A* algorithm is designed to generate conflict-free operational trajectories. Finally, a simulation study is conducted using a major airport in Southwest China as a case study. The results show that (1) the speed-profile design and airport operational-rule constraints affect the operational trajectories of unmanned guidance vehicles; (2) the proposed algorithm enables coordinated planning of both speed control and path selection, thereby improving overall operational efficiency by 43.65% compared with conventional operations, while ensuring conflict-free airport surface taxiing, due to the adoption of an improved A* trajectory-planning algorithm for unmanned guidance vehicles; (3) under the electric-powered guidance-vehicle scheme proposed in this study, the method achieves a 34.52% reduction in total energy consumption during the guidance phase compared with traditional Follow-Me guidance, enabling the simultaneous optimization of operational efficiency and energy consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.