ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Survey of AI-Enabled Predictive Maintenance for Railway Infrastructure: Models, Data Sources, and Research Challenges.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rail transport is central to achieving sustainable and energy-efficient mobility, and its digitalization is accelerating the adoption of condition-based maintenance (CBM) strategies. However, existing maintenance practices remain largely reactive or rely on limited rule-based diagnostics, which constrain safety, interoperability, and lifecycle optimization. This survey provides a comprehensive and structured review of Artificial Intelligence techniques applied to the preventive, predictive, and prescriptive maintenance of railway infrastructure. We analyze and compare machine learning and deep learning approaches-including neural networks, support vector machines, random forests, genetic algorithms, and end-to-end deep models-applied to parameters such as track geometry, vibration-based monitoring, and imaging-based inspection. The survey highlights the dominant data sources and feature engineering techniques, evaluates the model performance across subsystems, and identifies research gaps related to data quality, cross-network generalization, model robustness, and integration with real-time asset management platforms. We further discuss emerging research directions, including Digital Twins, edge AI, and Cyber-Physical predictive systems, which position AI as an enabler of autonomous infrastructure management. This survey defines the key challenges and opportunities to guide future research and standardization in intelligent railway maintenance ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.