ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Joint Mechanical Function and Control of the Front Leg During Cricket Fast Bowling: A 3D Motion Analysis Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cricket fast bowlers rely on the front leg as a mechanical lever during front foot contact, yet the underlying mechanisms that govern front leg behaviour remain unclear. This study examined front leg mechanics in 18 junior fast bowlers (17.2 ± 1.7 years) using a 14-camera 3D motion capture system and force platforms. Joint power and angular impulse analyses were performed to quantify hip and knee extension-flexion mechanics from front foot contact to ball release, enabling the classification of joint function as active (concentric), controlled (eccentric), or negligible. Power and angular impulse profiles revealed that front leg motion was dominated by controlled (eccentric) power at both the hip and knee, indicating that the regulation of knee angle occurred primarily through eccentric braking rather than concentric quadriceps extension. These findings suggest that achieving a "braced leg" position via isolated knee extensor strengthening may be ineffective. To evaluate whether kinematics and anthropometry contributed to performance, a multiple linear regression model was used. Run-up speed at back foot contact emerged as the strongest predictor of ball speed, whereas knee angle at front foot contact showed only a small and non-significant effect. Overall, the results indicate that front leg behaviour reflects coordinated whole-body dynamics, and performance interventions should prioritise momentum generation and timing across the kinetic chain rather than isolated joint actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.