ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Restoring Ambiguous Boundaries: An Efficient and Robust Framework for Underwater Camouflaged Object Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Novel Convolution to Interactive Capture and Recalibration Enhancement Module for Underwater Fish Detection in Sensor Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy of Underwater Camouflaged Object Detection (UCOD) is fundamentally constrained by severe boundary ambiguity, where biological mimicry blends targets into complex backgrounds and aquatic optical degradation erodes edge details. We propose a lightweight boundary perception detector named CAR-YOLO (Camouflage Ambiguity Resolution YOLO). Specifically, a frequency-domain dual-path mechanism (FRM-DWT/EG-IWT) leverages selective wavelet aggregation and dynamic injection to recover high-frequency edges. Subsequently, these high-frequency cues are synergized with low-frequency semantic information via the Low-level Adaptive Fusion (LAF) module. To further address noisy samples, an Uncertainty Calibration Head (UCH) refines supervision via prediction consistency. Finally, we constructed specialized datasets based on public data for training and evaluation, including UCOD10K and UWB-COT220. On UCOD10K, CAR-YOLO achieves 27.1% mAP50-95, surpassing several state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods while reducing parameters from 2.58 M to 2.43 M and GFLOPs from 6.3 to 5.9. On the challenging UWB-COT220 benchmark, the model attains 30.7% mAP50-95, marking a 7.7-point improvement over YOLOv11. Furthermore, cross-domain experiments on UODD demonstrate strong generalization. These results indicate that CAR-YOLO effectively mitigates boundary ambiguity, achieving an optimal balance between accuracy, robustness, and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.