Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41682385›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Comprehensive Review of Metaheuristic Algorithms for Node Placement in UAV Communication Networks.

S A Temesheva, D A Turlykozhayeva, S N Akhtanov, N M Ussipov, A A Zhunuskanov, Wenbin Sun, Qian Xu, Mingliang Tao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S A TemeshevaNonlinear Information Processes Laboratory (NIPL), Faculty of Physics and Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0000-2795-9586
D A TurlykozhayevaNonlinear Information Processes Laboratory (NIPL), Faculty of Physics and Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-7326-9196
S N AkhtanovNonlinear Information Processes Laboratory (NIPL), Faculty of Physics and Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-9705-8000
N M UssipovNonlinear Information Processes Laboratory (NIPL), Faculty of Physics and Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-3280
A A ZhunuskanovNonlinear Information Processes Laboratory (NIPL), Faculty of Physics and Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0002-5435-9740
Wenbin SunInformation and Communication Engineering Faculty, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-3371
Qian XuInformation and Communication Engineering Faculty, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4979-3932
Mingliang TaoInformation and Communication Engineering Faculty, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0329-7124

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62201462National Natural Science Foundation of China 62301433National Natural Science Foundation of China 62472355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Communication Networks (UAVCNs) have emerged as a transformative solution to enable resilient, scalable, and infrastructure-independent wireless communication in urban and remote environments. A key challenge in UAVCNs is the optimal placement of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) nodes to maximize coverage, connectivity, and overall network performance while minimizing latency, energy consumption, and packet loss. As this node placement problem is NP-hard, numerous meta-heuristic algorithms (MHAs) have been proposed to find near-optimal solutions efficiently. Although research in this area has produced a wide range of meta-heuristic algorithmic solutions, most existing review articles focus on MANETs with terrestrial nodes, while comprehensive reviews dedicated to node placement in UAV communication networks are relatively scarce. This article presents a critical and comprehensive review of meta-heuristic algorithms for UAVCN node placement. Beyond surveying existing methods, it systematically analyzes algorithmic strengths, vulnerabilities, and future research directions, offering actionable insights for selecting effective strategies in diverse UAVCN deployment scenarios. To demonstrate practical applicability, selected hybrid algorithms are evaluated in a reproducible Python framework using computational time and coverage metrics, highlighting their ability to optimize multiple objectives and providing guidance for future UAVCN optimization studies.

Indexed as

connectivitycoveragemetaheuristic algorithmsnode placementUAV communication networks

Identifiers

PMID41682385
PMCPMC12899026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.