Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41682372›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Validity of the Polar H10 for Continuous Measures of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Synchrony Analysis.

Victor Chung, Louise Chopin, Julien Karadayi, Julie Grèzes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victor ChungLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles (Inserm U960), Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5198-501X
Louise ChopinLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles (Inserm U960), Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.
Julien KaradayiLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles (Inserm U960), Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.
Julie GrèzesLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles (Inserm U960), Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5066-9154

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-EURE-0017Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-23-CE28-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart rate (HR), a non-invasive indicator of physiological arousal and autonomic nervous system engagement, is widely used in cognitive and affective sciences to monitor individual responses and interpersonal synchrony in dynamic emotional and social contexts. Recent advances in wearable sensors have enabled researchers to assess HR synchrony in ecologically valid settings. In this study, we replicate prior validations of the Polar H10 chest strap for individual HR measurement and extend these findings by evaluating its validity for measuring HR synchrony between individuals. Dyads completed a previously validated experimental task designed to elicit HR fluctuations while jointly attending to emotionally evocative, 5-min audiovisual stimuli. First, we observed high correspondence (Pearson's

Indexed as

Heart RateAutonomic Nervous SystemElectrocardiographyEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleWearable Electronic Devicesautonomiccardiacdyademotionhyperscanninginterpersonalneurophysiologicalwearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID41682372
PMCPMC12899868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.