ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Physics-Aware Spatiotemporal Consistency for Transferable Defense of Autonomous Driving Perception.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autonomous driving perception systems are vulnerable to physical adversarial attacks. Existing defenses largely adopt loosely coupled architectures where visual and kinematic cues are processed in isolation, thus failing to exploit physical spatiotemporal consistency as a structural prior and often struggling to balance adversarial robustness, transferability, accuracy, and efficiency under realistic attacks. We propose a physics-aware trajectory-appearance consistency defense that detects and corrects spatiotemporal inconsistencies by tightly coupling visual semantics with physical dynamics. The module combines a dual-stream spatiotemporal encoder with endogenous feature orchestration and a frequency-domain kinematic embedding, turning tracking artifacts that are usually discarded as noise into discriminative cues. These inconsistencies are quantified by a Trajectory-Appearance Mutual Exclusion (TAME) energy, which supports a physics-aware switching rule to override flawed visual predictions. Operating on detector backbone features, outputs, and tracking states, the defense can be attached as a plug-in module behind diverse object detectors. Experiments on nuScenes, KITTI, and BDD100K show that the proposed defense substantially improves robustness against diverse categories of attacks: on nuScenes, it improves Correction Accuracy (CA) from 86.5% to 92.1% while reducing the computational overhead from 42 ms to 19 ms. Furthermore, the proposed defense maintains over 71.0% CA when transferred to unseen detectors and sustaining 72.4% CA under adaptive attackers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.