ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Evaluating Gait Quality in People with Hip Osteoarthritis During Habitual and Fast Walking Using a Trunk Inertial Measurement Unit in Clinical Settings.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immediate effects of spinal manipulation, exercise therapy, and open-label placebo on lifting performance and pain in individuals with chronic non-specific back pain: a motion laboratory-based crossover randomized controlled trial.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Trial
- Age-Related Differences Across Adulthood in IMU-Derived Gait Quality During Habitual Walking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hip osteoarthritis (OA) affects the entire joint and significantly alters gait. Assessing gait through a single trunk inertial measurement unit (IMU) in clinical settings offers a more practical alternative to complex laboratory settings, allowing for the capture of natural gait movements with valuable biomechanical insights. We evaluated (1) whether gait quality differs between individuals with hip OA and healthy controls during habitual and fast walking, (2) whether gait changes from habitual to fast walking differ between groups. Forty individuals with hip OA and 40 age-matched healthy controls underwent 25-m habitual walk and 40-m fast walk. Six gait quality parameters-step symmetry, stride symmetry, stability, smoothness, regularity, and complexity-were analyzed from the IMU signals. During habitual walking, individuals with hip OA exhibited reduced symmetry and stability and several vertical impairments. During fast walking, individuals with hip OA continued to show reduced step symmetry and a more constrained gait in the mediolateral direction. Additionally, people with hip OA also showed limited adjustments when transitioning from habitual to fast walking, in contrast to the significant adjustments observed in healthy controls. These findings indicate that gait in individuals with hip OA is impaired during habitual and fast walking, with limited adaptations across the transition between the two conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.