Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41682315›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

GPIS-Based Calibration for Non-Overlapping Dual-LiDAR Systems Using a 2.5D Calibration Framework.

Huan Yu, Xiaohong Zhang, Ming Li, Desheng Zhuo, Pin Zhang, Man Li, Yuanyuan Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huan YuSchool of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.ORCID 0009-0009-5733-3432
Xiaohong ZhangChinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Ming LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
Desheng ZhuoSchool of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.ORCID 0009-0002-1567-2929
Pin ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Man LiDongfeng Motor Corporation Technical Center, Wuhan 430010, China.
Yuanyuan ShiDongfeng Motor Corporation Technical Center, Wuhan 430010, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42425003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual-LiDAR systems are widely deployed in autonomous driving, yet extrinsic calibration remains challenging in non-overlapping field-of-view (FoV) configurations where correspondence-based methods are unreliable. We propose an engineering-oriented 2.5D calibration framework that estimates horizontal extrinsics (x,y,yaw) via motion-guided planar alignment and then refines them using Gaussian Process Implicit Surfaces (GPIS), which provide continuous and probabilistic surface constraints from spatially disjoint scans. This design avoids calibration targets and reduces dependence on strong scene assumptions, improving robustness under noise and weak structure. Extensive high-fidelity simulation experiments demonstrate centimeter-level lateral accuracy and sub-degree yaw error, consistently outperforming representative motion-based and BEV-based baselines under both clean and noisy settings. To further assess real-world applicability, we conduct a preliminary nuScenes case study by splitting LiDAR scans into front and rear subsets to emulate a non-overlapping dual-LiDAR setup, achieving improved yaw accuracy and competitive lateral precision. Overall, the proposed method serves as a practical refinement stage for non-overlapping dual-LiDAR calibration, with a favorable balance of accuracy, robustness, and engineering feasibility.

Indexed as

autonomous drivingdual-LiDAR systemsextrinsic calibrationGPISnon-overlapping field of viewsurface modeling

Identifiers

PMID41682315
PMCPMC12899157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.