ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
GPIS-Based Calibration for Non-Overlapping Dual-LiDAR Systems Using a 2.5D Calibration Framework.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dual-LiDAR systems are widely deployed in autonomous driving, yet extrinsic calibration remains challenging in non-overlapping field-of-view (FoV) configurations where correspondence-based methods are unreliable. We propose an engineering-oriented 2.5D calibration framework that estimates horizontal extrinsics (x,y,yaw) via motion-guided planar alignment and then refines them using Gaussian Process Implicit Surfaces (GPIS), which provide continuous and probabilistic surface constraints from spatially disjoint scans. This design avoids calibration targets and reduces dependence on strong scene assumptions, improving robustness under noise and weak structure. Extensive high-fidelity simulation experiments demonstrate centimeter-level lateral accuracy and sub-degree yaw error, consistently outperforming representative motion-based and BEV-based baselines under both clean and noisy settings. To further assess real-world applicability, we conduct a preliminary nuScenes case study by splitting LiDAR scans into front and rear subsets to emulate a non-overlapping dual-LiDAR setup, achieving improved yaw accuracy and competitive lateral precision. Overall, the proposed method serves as a practical refinement stage for non-overlapping dual-LiDAR calibration, with a favorable balance of accuracy, robustness, and engineering feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.