Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41682304›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Machine Learning-Powered Vision for Robotic Inspection in Manufacturing: A Review.

David Yevgeniy Patrashko, Vladimir Gurau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David Yevgeniy PatrashkoRobotics Process Development Laboratory (RPDL), Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA.
Vladimir GurauRobotics Process Development Laboratory (RPDL), Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2742-9061

Funding

Georgia Southern University 2026 Undergraduate Research Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML)-powered vision for robotic inspection has accelerated with smart manufacturing, enabling automated defect detection and classification and real-time process optimization. This review provides insight into the current landscape and state-of-the-art practices in smart manufacturing quality control (QC). More than 50 studies spanning across automotive, aerospace, assembly, and general manufacturing sectors demonstrate that ML-powered vision is technically viable for robotic inspection in manufacturing. The accuracy of defect detection and classification frequently exceeds 95%, with some vision systems achieving 98-100% accuracy in controlled environments. The vision systems use predominantly self-designed convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, YOLO variants, or traditional ML vision models. However, 77% of implementations remain at the prototype or pilot scale, revealing systematic deployment barriers. A discussion is provided to address the specifics of the vision systems and the challenges that these technologies continue to face. Finally, recommendations for future directions in ML-powered vision for robotic inspection in manufacturing are provided.

Indexed as

computer vision for industrial quality controldeep learning in robotic vision inspectionmachine learning in manufacturing

Identifiers

PMID41682304
PMCPMC12899094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.