ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning-Powered Vision for Robotic Inspection in Manufacturing: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physics-Guided Patch Distribution Modeling for Unsupervised Pin Defect Detection of Electrical Connectors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML)-powered vision for robotic inspection has accelerated with smart manufacturing, enabling automated defect detection and classification and real-time process optimization. This review provides insight into the current landscape and state-of-the-art practices in smart manufacturing quality control (QC). More than 50 studies spanning across automotive, aerospace, assembly, and general manufacturing sectors demonstrate that ML-powered vision is technically viable for robotic inspection in manufacturing. The accuracy of defect detection and classification frequently exceeds 95%, with some vision systems achieving 98-100% accuracy in controlled environments. The vision systems use predominantly self-designed convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, YOLO variants, or traditional ML vision models. However, 77% of implementations remain at the prototype or pilot scale, revealing systematic deployment barriers. A discussion is provided to address the specifics of the vision systems and the challenges that these technologies continue to face. Finally, recommendations for future directions in ML-powered vision for robotic inspection in manufacturing are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.