ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Model-Driven Processing of Passive Seismic While Drilling Data Acquired Using Distributed Acoustic Sensing Without Conventional Drill-Bit Pilot Measurements.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article presents an advanced processing workflow for a Seismic While Drilling (SWD) dataset acquired using Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) in a cross-well setting at the Otway International Test Centre (OITC) in Victoria, Australia, where no pilot signals were recorded. Recording the drill bit signature enables and simplifies the decoding of passive seismic signals emitted by the drill bit while drilling. In conventional SWD, a measured drill bit signature is used to correlate passive seismic recordings and to determine source trigger times, analogous to vibroseis processing. Without this reference, both source timing and signature must be inferred from the recorded wavefield. This can typically be achieved by backpropagating the recorded seismic data over short time windows, estimating the source location and trigger time based on the peak RMS energy in space and time. However, to simplify the processing of SWD data, a data processing workflow is presented, guided by travel time and seismic modelling, which transforms passive SWD data into active equivalents. The transformed data can then be used to characterize the subsurface by implementing travel time tomography and cross-well imaging. The results demonstrate reliable velocity and structural information can be recovered from DAS-based SWD data without pilot measurements, enabling simplified and scalable deployment of passive seismic while-drilling workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.