ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Predicting Performance in Working Memory During the Waking Period by Applying a Convolutional Neural Network to EEG Data in the N-Back Task: A Pilot Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memory performance is regulated by circadian rhythms, and electroencephalograms (EEG) measure biological signals related to memory mechanisms and circadian rhythms. Therefore, EEG could be used to detect changes in diurnal memory. In this study, we measured the EEG signals of participants conducting a memory-related task and tested the effectiveness of a convolutional neural network (CNN) in predicting memory task performance at different times. EEG signals from participants performing N-back tasks at 8-9 a.m. and 3-4 p.m. were recorded. While performance showed no significant differences between times, differences were observed in EEG relative power. A CNN was trained using the relative power and raw waveform data of the EEG signals recorded during the tasks. When predicting the time at which the working memory (WM) was enhanced, the relative power CNN exhibited a significantly higher accuracy than the raw waveform CNN. However, the performance dropped in the test where the training data did not include the EEG data of the same participant. Overall, these results suggest that while EEG signals using a relative power CNN have high predictive potential, developing a personalized classification system that reflects individual chronotypes is effective for practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.