ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Analyzing Fault Reactivation Behavior Using InSAR, Stress Inversion, and Field Observations During the 2025 Sındırgı Earthquake Sequence, Simav Fault Zone, Western Türkiye.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Sındırgı earthquake sequence, with moment magnitudes of 6.1 on 10 August and 27 October 2025, respectively, occurred within the Simav Fault Zone in western Türkiye, rupturing nearby but structurally distinct fault segments. In this study, we combine Sentinel-1 InSAR time-series measurements with seismological data, geomorphic observations, and post-event field surveys to examine how deformation evolved between and after these events. InSAR results indicate coseismic line-of-sight displacements of 6-7 cm, followed by post-seismic deformation that persisted for months at 8-10 mm/yr. This behavior signifies that deformation continued well beyond the initial rupture. The estimated displacement does not align with a single fault plane. Instead, it corresponds to a network of early-mapped and previously unrecognized fault segments. Seismicity patterns and stress tensor inversions show that activity migrated spatially after 10 August and that the faulting mechanism altered before the second earthquake. When synthesized, observations indicate stress transfer within a modular, segmented fault system, thought to have been influenced by regional structural complexity. Field investigations after the October earthquake reported new surface cracks and fault traces, providing evidence of shallow deformation. The collected results indicate that post-seismic stress redistribution played a leading role in modulating the 2025 Sındırgı earthquake sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.