ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare systems worldwide are burdened significantly due to glaucoma, which is a leading cause of irreversible blindness. A total of 76 million are currently affected, and it is estimated that by the year 2040, 112 million will be affected by glaucoma. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a recent innovation that plays a key role in glaucoma management. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the safety and efficacy of MIGS devices and procedures and their use in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) to lower intraocular pressure (IOP).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.