Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41682065›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Effect of 20 wt% Glass Fiber Reinforcement on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Injection-Molded PA6 and PA66.

Serhad Dilber, Lütfiye Dahil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Serhad DilberMechanical Engineering Department, Istanbul Aydin University, Beşyol Mah. Inönü Cad. No:38, Istanbul 34295, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0001-2418-0160
Lütfiye DahilMechanical Engineering Department, Istanbul Aydin University, Beşyol Mah. Inönü Cad. No:38, Istanbul 34295, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanical performance and surface morphology of polyamide-based materials commonly used in plastic injection molding. Two resins, PA6 and PA66, were analyzed in both neat and 20 wt% glass fiber-reinforced (GF20) forms. The influence of reinforcement and material type on tensile strength and ductility was examined through integrated experimental and numerical approaches, complemented by microstructural and elemental analyses. PA6 and PA66 specimens were produced in accordance with ISO 527, and tensile tests revealed a significant increase in elastic modulus and tensile strength with glass fiber reinforcement, accompanied by a reduction in elongation at break. Flammability was evaluated via Glow Wire and Tracking tests. SEM-EDS analyses provided insights into fracture morphology and elemental distribution, showing that fiber-matrix interfacial debonding and fiber pull-out dominated failure in reinforced specimens, whereas neat polymers exhibited homogeneous surfaces. Finite element simulations performed in ANSYS Explicit Dynamics supported the experimental findings by identifying stress concentration zones and failure initiation regions. Although numerical simulations successfully captured stress distribution trends, quantitative differences were attributed to idealized modeling assumptions and processing-induced microstructural effects. Overall, this work provides a comprehensive assessment of the reinforcement effects in PA6 and PA66 systems, offering valuable guidance for material selection and design optimization in polymer-based engineering components.

Indexed as

finite element analysisglass fiber reinforcementinjection moldingmechanical propertiesPA66)polyamide (PA6SEM analysis

Identifiers

PMID41682065
PMCPMC12899177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.