ReviewPolymers2026
Research Progress in Chitin/Chitosan-Based Biomass Adhesives: Extraction Processes, Composite and Chemical Modification.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adhesives and Sealants in Packaging: Advanced Materials, Performance, and Emerging Technologies (Part II).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Smart Materials for Dirty Waters: Reversible Aerogels Unlock Closed-Loop Heavy Metal Remediation.Small science · 2026Article
- A Glyoxal Based Co-Condensation Adhesive with Excellent Water Resistance Using Chitosan and Starch as Enhanced Agents.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional fossil-based adhesives, hindered by issues such as formaldehyde emission, dependence on fossil resources, and poor biodegradability, struggle to meet the global demand for low-carbon green development. Biomass-based adhesives have thus emerged as a core alternative. Among them, chitin/chitosan derived from biomass waste such as shrimp and crab shells demonstrates significant potential in the adhesive field due to its renewability, controllable structure, biocompatibility, and inherent antibacterial properties. However, mainstream biomass adhesives like soy protein and starch adhesives suffer from poor water resistance and insufficient wet adhesion strength. Pure chitin/chitosan-based adhesive systems also exhibit low wet strength retention. Furthermore, the overall development faces challenges including high extraction costs, insufficient performance synergy, poor industrial compatibility, and a lack of standardized systems. This review follows the framework of "resource-extraction-modification-performance-application-challenges" to systematically summarize relevant research progress. It clarifies the molecular structure and intrinsic advantages of chitin/chitosan, outlines extraction processes such as acid/alkali and enzymatic methods, and characterization techniques including FT-IR and XRD. The review focuses on analyzing modification strategies such as composite modification, chemical modification, biomineralization, and biomimetic design, and verifies the application potential of these adhesives in wood processing, biomedicine, paper-based packaging, and other fields. Research indicates that chitin/chitosan-based adhesives provide an effective pathway for the green transformation of the adhesive industry. Future efforts should concentrate on developing green extraction processes, designing multifunctional integrated systems, and achieving full resource utilization of biomass. Additionally, establishing comprehensive standardized systems and promoting the translation of laboratory research into industrial applications are crucial to driving the industry's green transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.