ReviewPolymers2026
Innovative Physical and Chemical Strategies for the Modification and Development of Polymeric Microfiltration Membranes-A Review.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Polymeric Nanofiltration Membranes with Enhanced Hydrophilic, Morphological, Transport, and Antifouling Properties-A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Engineering Antifouling Polysulfone Membranes Enhanced with Hydroxylated Amino-Functionalized TiOPolymers · 2026Article
- Removal of Contaminants of Emerging Concern from Wastewater Using Photocatalytic Membranes: Current Status and Challenges.Membranes · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymeric microfiltration membranes are among the most utilized pressure-driven membranes due to their excellent permeation flux, moderate removal efficiency, low operating pressure, low cost, as well as their potential for reusability and cleanability. Therefore, these membranes are used in different crucial sectors, including the water and wastewater, dairy, beverage, and pharmaceutical industries. However, well-known polymeric microfiltration membranes suffer from their poor hydrophilic properties, causing fouling phenomenon. A reduction in permeate flux, a shortened operational lifespan, and increased energy consumption are the primary negative consequences of membrane fouling. Over the years, a broad spectrum of studies has been performed to modify polymeric microfiltration membranes to improve their hydrophilic, transport, and antifouling characteristics. Despite extensive research, this issue remains a subject of ongoing discussion and scrutiny within the scientific community. This review article provides promising information about different physical and chemical modification methods-such as polymer blending, the incorporation of nanomaterials, surface coating, chemical crosslinking, in situ nanoparticle immobilization, and chemical surface functionalization-for polymeric microfiltration membranes. The physical and chemical modification methods are comparatively evaluated, highlighting their positive and negative aspects, supported by findings from recent investigations. Moreover, promising ideas and future-oriented techniques were proposed to obtain polymeric microfiltration membranes containing superior efficiency, extended service life, and mechanical strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.