ArticleCancers2026
Single-Cell Comparison of Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors and Enterochromaffin Cells from Two Patients.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have attempted to identify the initiating drivers of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumor (SI-NET) development and the molecular mechanisms underlying their progression and metastatic spread. Previous gene expression studies have used bulk microarrays or RNA sequencing to compare tumor tissue with normal intestinal mucosa. However, the intestine comprises multiple distinct cell types, and bulk analyses are limited by this cellular heterogeneity, which can confound tumor-specific signals.
methodsWe performed single-cell RNA sequencing on primary SI-NETs and paired normal mucosa from two patients to directly compare tumor cells with their cells of origin, the enterochromaffin (EC) cells. To minimize type I errors, we applied a two-step validation strategy by overlapping differentially expressed genes with an external single-cell dataset and cross-referencing candidate genes for enteroendocrine expression in the Human Protein Atlas.
resultsFor further distinction and characterization, ECs were subdivided into serotonergic and non-serotonergic clusters. This analysis revealed that the SI-NET cells are transcriptionally more similar to serotonergic ECs, consistent with serum metabolite profiles derived from clinical parameters. Our analyses uncovered a loss-of-expression program characterized by regulators of epithelial differentiation and in parallel, a gain-of-expression program displayed neuronal signaling gene induction, implicating functional reprogramming toward neuronal-like properties. Together, these specific losses and gains suggest that our patient-derived SI-NETs undergo adaptation through both loss of enteroendocrine functions and acquisition of neurobiological-promoting signaling pathways.
conclusionsThese findings nominate candidate drivers for further functional validation and highlight potential therapeutic strategies in our patient cohort, including restoring suppressed Notch signaling and targeting aberrant neuronal signaling networks. However, even with a two-step validation procedure, the modest cohort size limits statistical power and generalizability, particularly for the proposed association to a serotonergic phenotype. Larger, multi-patient single-cell studies are required to confirm these mechanisms and establish their clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.