Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681902›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

CT-Assessed Body Composition as Predictor of Post-Operative Complications in Lung Cancer Patients.

Stefania Rizzo, Francesco Petrella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefania RizzoClinic of Radiology EOC, Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5151-0866
Francesco PetrellaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5945-1576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body composition, specifically the quantification of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue using preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging, is a clinically significant predictor of postoperative complications after lung cancer surgery. The main features of CT-derived body composition analysis are: skeletal muscle index, muscle density, adipose tissue quantification and automated or semi-automated segmentation. Low skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) independently increases the risk of perioperative complications, including respiratory complications, and is associated with longer hospital length of stay and worse long-term survival. Sarcopenic obesity-characterized by low muscle mass in the context of high adiposity-further elevates complication risk and prolongs recovery. CT-derived measures such as muscle cross-sectional area, muscle density, and adipose tissue distribution (visceral, subcutaneous, and intramuscular) provide more precise risk stratification than BMI alone. Skeletal muscle area and density are inversely correlated with postoperative complications and recurrence risk; patients with lower muscle mass and density experience more adverse outcomes. In men, age and reduced skeletal muscle area are particularly strong predictors of complications after pneumonectomy. Obesity, when not accompanied by sarcopenia or myosteatosis, may confer a survival advantage-the so-called "obesity paradox"-but this protective effect is lost in patients with low muscle mass or poor muscle quality. Systemic inflammation and nutritional status further modulate the impact of body composition on surgical risk. This review highlights the critical role of CT-derived body composition analysis in predicting postoperative outcomes following lung cancer surgery.

Indexed as

body compositioncomputed tomography (CT)lung cancer surgerypostoperative complicationssarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID41681902
PMCPMC12897418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.