ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
CBCT Assessment for Dental Implant Surgery at the Maxilla: A Clinical Update.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative efficacy of fascia lata allograft, platelet-rich fibrin, and connective tissue graft for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Comparative Analysis of Bone Remodeling Dynamics and Bone Vitality Following Standard Bone Augmentation Procedures: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In contemporary practice, dental implants are widely recognized as a reliable and effective solution for rehabilitating edentulous patients. Nevertheless, implant placement in the atrophied maxilla presents considerable challenges, with treatment planning influenced by various factors such as patient demographics, anatomical constraints, and economic considerations. Advances in imaging technology have positioned cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as the preferred modality for enhancing implant placement accuracy. By producing high-resolution three-dimensional radiographic images, CBCT facilitates precise assessment of maxillary anatomy at the proposed implant site-including bone height, width, length, and angulation-thereby optimizing surgical planning and improving the predictability and success rates of implant integration. Moreover, the timing of implant placement must account for the necessity of maxillary augmentation to ensure implant stability and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. This review discusses the clinical utility of CBCT as a diagnostic tool for preoperative assessment, focusing on the identification of critical anatomical landmarks and the determination of indications for bone augmentation, thereby highlighting its crucial role in enabling accurate treatment planning, minimizing surgical risks, and promoting the long-term survival of dental implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.