Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681797›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

CBCT Assessment for Dental Implant Surgery at the Maxilla: A Clinical Update.

Wai Yu Chelsea Chung, Feng Wang, Yiu Yan Leung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wai Yu Chelsea ChungOral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Feng WangOral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4511-686X
Yiu Yan LeungOral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6670-6570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contemporary practice, dental implants are widely recognized as a reliable and effective solution for rehabilitating edentulous patients. Nevertheless, implant placement in the atrophied maxilla presents considerable challenges, with treatment planning influenced by various factors such as patient demographics, anatomical constraints, and economic considerations. Advances in imaging technology have positioned cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as the preferred modality for enhancing implant placement accuracy. By producing high-resolution three-dimensional radiographic images, CBCT facilitates precise assessment of maxillary anatomy at the proposed implant site-including bone height, width, length, and angulation-thereby optimizing surgical planning and improving the predictability and success rates of implant integration. Moreover, the timing of implant placement must account for the necessity of maxillary augmentation to ensure implant stability and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. This review discusses the clinical utility of CBCT as a diagnostic tool for preoperative assessment, focusing on the identification of critical anatomical landmarks and the determination of indications for bone augmentation, thereby highlighting its crucial role in enabling accurate treatment planning, minimizing surgical risks, and promoting the long-term survival of dental implants.

Indexed as

bone augmentationcone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)dental implantmaxillarisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41681797
PMCPMC12897332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.